Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Final Piece of Courthouse Financing Scheme Crashes and Burns

In the 1990’s, Ada County taxpayers were told that a public/private partnership would be a means of acquiring a new courthouse at a discounted price. One of the subsidies that was supposed to offset a portion of the cost of paying off the courthouse bonds was parking revenue from the project on an ongoing basis.

Boise’s redevelopment agency, Capital City Development Corporation (CCDC), was intricately involved with the complex courthouse financing scheme. CCDC also owns and manages the majority of downtown parking facilities, including courthouse parking.

When the courthouse opened in early 2002, visitors were charged one dollar ($1) per hour for parking. Since then, CCDC has changed the fee structure for all of their parking facilities, including at the courthouse. They now provide the first hour of parking free, but have raised rates to $2.50 per hour.

Despite having increased their hourly parking rate a hundred and fifty percent since the courthouse opened, representatives of CCDC came to the Board last week to let my Commission colleagues and me know that revenues are lower than expected and they need more money to offset the cost of payments for the courthouse bond debt. CCDC wants either increased parking rates, or a payment each year from county taxpayers, to make up the deficit. When I asked the amount of the deficit, no one present at the meeting from CCDC was able to answer my question. What we do know, at this point, is that there is a deficit.

No matter how well intentioned at the time, no part of the much ballyhooed courthouse financing scheme worked as intended. The folks who fought against using “creative” financing (including former legislators Robert “Bob” Forrey, Jim Auld, Rachel Gilbert and Rod Beck) for a new Ada County courthouse were right. It didn’t work. Sadly, Ada County’s taxpayers are now paying the price.

4 Comments:

At February 5, 2009 at 3:07 AM , Blogger Gordon said...

If they can't pay, and they default, who gets to take possession and own this white elephant?

 
At February 5, 2009 at 8:25 AM , Blogger Unknown said...

Sharon, you may want to look into why the call for an audit of the CCDC by three candidates(one of whom was the freaking mayor) has been completely ignored by the CCDC. This renegade group has been operating outside of controls for way too long!

 
At February 5, 2009 at 7:21 PM , Blogger Paul Alldredge said...

Urban Renewal is nothing short of taxpayer abuse. I have yet to find an instance where it is anything but an end run around bond elections.

The boards are there for the life of the district and this too is taxpayer abuse.

The UR boards sell all this bling on the blather it won't cost taxpayers any money. Bull!

 
At February 6, 2009 at 5:46 AM , Blogger The Boise Picayune said...

Transparency and accountability will come only with the absorption of Boise’s various Shadow Governments - such as the CCDC - into existing city agencies and departments.

A move as unpopular within City Hall as within the Shadow Governments themselves, because it will also bring an end to years of Plausible Deniability afforded City Hall.



The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results! ~ Albert Einstein

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home